Based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute his claim against Defendant Clarke, Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order to Show Cause (ECF No. The Court notes that Plaintiff did not file an objection to Defendants RIDOC and Wall's Motion to Dismiss despite being granted an extension of time to respond and that Plaintiff subsequently failed to respond to the Court's JOrder to show cause why the Court should not proceed to rule on the Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Clarke argues that Plaintiff has not communicated with her since May 8, 2017.
Jennifer Clarke's Motion for Court Order for Plaintiff to Show Cause why his claim against her should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Motion for Order to Show Cause") (ECF No. 94) is GRANTED and Defendants RIDOC and Wall shall be dismissed from the case.Īlso before the Court is Defendant Dr. 103) in its entirety and adopts the reasoning set forth therein. After carefully reviewing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and the R&R, this Court ACCEPTS the R&R (ECF No. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R&R. Wall's unopposed motion to dismiss (ECF No.
_lr.jpg "ridoc health fair")
Sullivan's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), filed on July 20, 2017, recommending that the Court grant Defendants Rhode Island Department of Corrections ("RIDOC") and Ashbel T. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Patricia A.
0 kommentar(er)
