che 00:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC) Reply You have to put the unsharpness radius (the size of the blurred out image of a one pixel object) in relation to the image size (width). It is meaningless to accept 300×300 pictures or even 600×600 pictures, and to refuse 3000×2000 pictures because they are "unsharp" at maximal viewing resolution.ĭavid.Monniaux 11:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Reply I think so too. I think we should here consider not only sharpness, but also resolution. Often, pictures are refused because they are "unsharp".
44 Rename Commons:Featured picture candidates to Commons:Featured media candidates.40 Proposal: Picture of the Year and Picture of the Month contests.39 Delisting candidates on another page?.38 Suggested requirement: SVGs should pass validation.36 Should really everyone be allowed to vote?.34 See section above regarding "strongly oppose" template.32 Categories or Galleries should be requested for Featured pictures.31 New color scheme for voting templates.29 Let's thnak the creator, uploader and nominator of images.25 Strongly against the Strong oppose template.23 Featured picture delisting candidates.19 Quality Images - suggestions requested.18 Change presentation to gallery with links to full noms?.12 Delisting Featured Pictures - suggestion.11 Proposal for a modified nomination procedure.10.3 How to fix this problem of page length.10 Proposal for an abridged voting procedure.8 Template for nominated but not featured pics.3.2 Please add FP Removal Candidates to other-language versions of COM:FPC!.
0 kommentar(er)
